Thursday, July 8, 2004

 

THE EQUININE DERRIERE AWARD’S SECOND HONORED RECIPIENT:

 

JIM ROBINSON, OWNER AND TYRANT OF FreeRepublic.Com

 

 

Until last week, I considered myself a proud member of FreeRepublic.com, a conservative forum for news and discussion.  Most of the conservatives I met on the site had thinking very close to my own, and I felt like I had found a treasure trove of brothers and sisters.  I even donated to the latest call for money.  Boy, what a mistake.

 

At the time, I didn’t know about FreeRepublic’s dark secret – the crazy Uncle in the attic.  Well actually, the crazy uncle is the owner and operator of FreeRepublic, one Jim Robinson, who I was to find out is a nutcase and tyrant who brooks no variance from whatever he considers to be “the truth.”  My error was in defending the South in a couple of discussions related to the so-called Civil War. 

 

In one case, the Yankee I was arguing with called me a Konfederate Kool-Aid drinker, and it was obvious that the K’s were to designate the Ku Klux Klan.  I told him he was a bigot to even suggest such a thing.  Apparently, Big Brother Jim Robinson was watching, but it took the second discussion for him to kick me off the forum.  On the 4th of July, some liberal troll posted Frederick Douglas’s lament about “What is the Fourth of July to the Slave?”  Basically, my response was “Who cares?”  Slavery has been over for a long time and the posting was an unnecessary dampener for our Fourth of July spirits.  It is a common liberal trick – bring up slavery on the Fourth of July to remind us that we are not a great nation after all, but evil former slave owners.  The idea is to wear away at our faith and belief in our country.  I wouldn’t stand for it, and told the poster that slavery was the result of impersonal forces over three millennia, had to be understood in the context of its times and that, yes, it was evil, but now it’s gone and there is nothing positive to be gained by bringing it up on the Fourth of July.

 

Somehow the cretinous owner of FreeRepublic put two and two together and got five, and believed that I was an advocate of slavery, because he then kicked me off the board.  I wrote to him demanding to know why I was the victim of so capricious and frivolous an action, but he would only respond in grunting generalities, stating that I wanted to “deny freedom to others” and was using “twisted thinking.”  Again I asked for a specific example and received none.  It seems Jim Robinson is not overly bright, informed or articulate, as he was completely unable to verbalize any clear reason for my dismissal.  I told him that if he could not argue any better than that, he ought to stay away from his own forums, lest he be eaten alive.  Indeed, I will say so openly right now for the entire world to see:  if I ever debated Jim Robinson on any subject you may choose, save that of being a cretinous moron (his only field of expertise), I would whip his ass so bad he would cry for his mama.  Jim Robinson is an intellectual pantywaist.

 

What Jim should have done was to reinstate me and apologize for insulting me; but Jim Robinson is no gentleman.  I pointed out to him that he had seriously misjudged me, but the more I pointed out the injustice of his booting me, the angrier he became.  Jim had made up his mind and did not want to be confused with the facts.  It is clear that Confederate descendants and Civil War buffs who favor the South are not welcome at FreeRepublic.com, because we obviously must believe in slavery.  Presumably, if one has a scholarly discussion on cannibalism, old Jim would conclude they must be Hannibal Lecter, or if they discuss auto mechanics, Jimbo might mistake them for a transmission right out of a Ford Pickup.  His deep intellect is truly cause for awe and wonder.  Let me spell it out for you, Jim:  intellectual discussion and debate over the meaning and causes of the American Civil War, or of the causes, practices and history of American slavery do not translate into a modern advocacy of slavery, any more than a discussion of 18th Century medical practices translates into an advocacy of blood-letting and leeches for modern hospitals.  Got it, Jimmy?  Right now Jim Robinson is reading these words and saying “DUU-UU-UUH!”

 

I looked around the internet and asked around conservative circles, and learned that Jim Robinson has become increasingly irrational and tyrannical over the past few months, even since he got his butt successfully sued by two major newspapers for posting their copyrighted material without permission.  A Salon article from 1999 particularly takes Jim Robinson to task, noting that early supporters of Free Republic like Matt Drudge and Lucianne Goldberg separated themselves from the website after Jim and his cadre of butt-sucking sycophants began attacking George Bush and his father.  Goldberg even publicly disparaged Robinson when she stated publicly:  “He’s a mean little shit.”  Ditto that!  Or as they say at FreeRepublic, “PING!” Goldberg started her own conservative news website and took 2,000 former Freepers with her.  These folks were smarter than I am:  they left voluntarily.

 

Nowadays Jim Robinson regularly goes through his membership and performs cyber-purges of any and all who voice opinions he either doesn’t understand or agree with.  He’s hyper-sensitive to any liberal criticisms about the “far right,” as if that fact would somehow gain him respect among the Neo-Bolsheviks.   His purges have been so extensive that old Jimbo has even posted a justification on his board making it clear that Free Speech at FreeRepublic is not guaranteed.  It’s obvious that the little man loves the feeling of power that derives from his powers of cyber-banishment.  He may not be able to argue in his own forums, he may not even understand the argument, but by gosh he can fix you pointy-headed intellectuals by hitting the “member delete” key. 

 

FreeRepublic claims to be “protecting the Constitution,” but apparently only as it pertains to Jim Robinson.  Either that, or it’s the Constitution of Uzbekistan and not that of the USA.  Jim defends this by noting that FreeRepublic is “his property.”  Well, yes and no.

 

First off, FreeRepublic is funded strictly through donations from the Conservative community, without whom it would be nothing but magnetic impulses stored on a hard drive.  Rabid Robinson may not realize it, but FreeRepublic is really a partnership – of him for keeping the software and server up and running, and everyone for posting the news articles and comments.  The Conservative community writes and posts the material, funds the forum and does most of the work.  When Conservatives are regularly treated to rude, boorish and heavy-handed caprice like described above, then old Jim-Bob has broken the unspoken contract.  He has betrayed the faith and trust of the community that supports his operation.

 

For these reasons I am asking all Conservatives to stay away from FreeRepublic.com, and do not give crazy Uncle Jim any more money.  The only thing I will give Jim now is the one-fingered salute and this month’s very special Equinine Derriere Award.  Have someone translate it for you Jim.

 

HORSE’S PATOOTIE OF MARCH 30, 2003:  CYNTHIA TUCKER, THE RACE-BAITING LEFTIST OF THE ATLANTA JOURNAL AND CONSTITUTION.   Tucker is obsessed with the 1956 state flag of Georgia, which incorporated within it the Confederate battle flag.  Like so many other cultural bigots, she is completely unable to grasp the fact that Confederate flags and symbols are valued and revered as sacred heritage items.  To her little pea-sized brain, the 1956 flag could only have been invented as a symbol of defiance to desegregation laws.  The anti-flaggers have been unable to come up with any hard evidence that this is so:  no minutes of meetings of the Georgia 1956 legislature, no newspaper articles, no speeches from that time period ever mention making the 1956 flag a symbol of segregation.

Indeed, there is plenty of evidence that it is NOT so, since the minutes and newspaper articles of the time, plus testimony of the author of the 1956 bill to change the flag, all point to Southern pride and heritage as the ONLY reasons for the flag change. 

However, two years ago, the anti-flaggers arm-twisted a very old man, Denmark Groover, floor leader of 1956, to publicly state that he had “probably” used race as a factor in persuading the Legislature to pass the 1956 flag bill.  (Where are the minutes that support this, Cynthia?  They don’t exist, do they?) Pretty thin evidence, but we are supposed to accept this in spite of far more persuasive evidence to the contrary.  You see, Cynthia is one of those privileged few whose delicate sensibilities must take precedence over the great majority of Georgians simply because of her skin color, which makes her exempt from criticism and requires that her opinions on race be taken as gospel, without question.  But not here, Cynthia.  Here we recognize you for what you are:  an inveterate and unprincipled liar.  We are going to have a vote on the Georgia state flag, and you and I are going to accept the will of the Democratic majority.  You are not going to defeat the Democratic process, though Lord knows you tried in the Bush-Gore election as well as the flag issue.

I am old enough to remember 1956.  I remember liberal San Francisco of that time period.  Thousands of Confederate battle flags flew everywhere, and Fisherman’s Wharf was abloom with them.  They were silk flags for sale to tourists, stapled onto bamboo sticks, and made in Taiwan.  No one thought of them as anything other than a flag of Southern pride.  What the anti-flaggers of Georgia are doing is projecting modern sensibilities onto the past, the same mistake they make in interpreting the Civil War.  The Confederate battle flag has only recently become falsely smeared as a racist symbol by the machinations of the NAACP; such associations did not exist in 1956.  But Cynthia Tucker, leftwing Democrat, never lets facts get in the way of her personal bigotry.